Visit Citebite Deep link provided by Citebite
Close this shade
Source:  http://rawstory.com/2009/11/ama-review-pot-prohibition/

American Medical Association rethinking pot prohibition?

By Daniel Tencer
Tuesday, November 10th, 2009 -- 1:05 pm
Share on Facebook Stumble This!

marijuana American Medical Association rethinking pot prohibition?The American Medical Association on Tuesday issued a cautious but historically significant call to change America's marijuana prohibition laws, urging a "review" of the drug's status as a Schedule I drug.

At a meeting in Houston, the AMA's House of Delegates adopted a new policy that calls for "marijuana's status as a federal Schedule I controlled substance be reviewed with the goal of facilitating the conduct of clinical research and development of cannabinoid-based medicines, and alternate delivery methods."

That does not mean the AMA supports the legalization or decriminalization of marijuana.

Schedule I drugs are those considered to have no medical benefit and to be harmful when used under any circumstances. As such, marijuana is currently grouped by the federal government with drugs like heroin and LSD. By comparison, cocaine and methamphetamines are classified as Schedule II drugs, which may have some clinical benefits when used in the proper circumstances. The AMA's stance could simply result in the rescheduling of marijuana as a controlled substance that has some medical benefit.

However, Aaron Houston, director of government relations for the Marijuana Policy Project, calls the move "historic" all the same, noting that it comes from "what has historically been America's most cautious and conservative major medical organization."

Story continues below...

"Marijuana's Schedule I status is not just scientifically untenable, given the wealth of recent data showing it to be both safe and effective for chronic pain and other conditions, but it's been a major obstacle to needed research," he said in a statement.

"It's been 72 years since the AMA has officially recognized that marijuana has both already-demonstrated and future-promising medical utility," said medical student Sunil Aggarwal in a press statement from Americans for Safe Access. Aggarwal has been spearheading the effort by the AMA's youth wing to change the organization's attitude towards marijuana.

ASA government affairs director Caren Woodson pointed out that the American College of Physicians, the country's second-largest medical group, called for a review of marijuana's status last year.

"The two largest physician groups in the US have established medical marijuana as a health care issue that must be addressed," Woodson said. "Both organizations have underscored the need for change by placing patients above politics."

In its report (PDF), the AMA stated:

Results of short term controlled trials indicate that smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis. However, the patchwork of state-based systems that have been established for .medical marijuana. is woefully inadequate in establishing even rudimentary safeguards that normally would be applied to the appropriate clinical use of psychoactive substances. The future of cannabinoid-based medicine lies in the rapidly evolving field of botanical drug substance development, as well as the design of molecules that target various aspects of the endocannabinoid system. To the extent that rescheduling marijuana out of Schedule I will benefit this effort, such a move can be supported.

The AMA's move is the latest in a series of small but significant shifts in attitudes towards the liberalization of marijuana policies.

Last month, conservative columnist George F. Will said that the US is "probably in the process" of legalizing marijuana, pointing to the Obama administration's new policy to no longer raid medical marijuana clinics that are legal under state law, so long as those state laws are being observed. (Though one California-based US attorney disputes that there has been any change in policy.)

Additionally, California is currently debating a proposal to decriminalize marijuana. Massachusetts decriminalized marijuana in a state ballot last year.

And recent polls show that support for decriminalization of marijuana has reached a record high in the United States, with some 44 percent of Americans now in favor of reducing or eliminating criminal penalties for possession of the herb.

Share this article:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Story comments are below...
  • WJM51
    Well, it's about freaking time, seeing as how they were one of TWO industry groups who spoke out against the prohibition in 1937. They KNOW it's good for hundreds of things, they just make tons of money on the pill pushing pharma gravy train. They also know that it's NEVER killed anyone, and that the pill pushers kill 200,000 Americans every year, FAR more than all the illegal drugs combined.

    BTW, the other industry group was the bird seed manufacturers, who knew that without good nutrition, songbirds won't sing. They know that hemp seed is a complete nutrition source, and that even humans can not only live, but survive quite well on it and water. They used to use the seed for food in TB asylums, because it allows more nutrition to get to the body than any other food source and it's easy on the body.

    And they know all about he US Senate studies in '70 and 72 that found that people who smoke it tend to live LONGER than their next door neighbors who don't.

    Time to end this stupidity. Stop screwing people for doing something that never killed anyone. Especially if you are going to glorify things like going to war against countries that never threatened or attacked us. Stop seeing the American people as nothing but a bottomless pocket and fodder for your profitable prison industry. Stop screwing up people's lives. it is that simple. Stop making things worse than they would ordinarily be if you just left the situation alone.
  • rickpetes
    My GOD! Don't you understand that if we legalize marijuana, we'll have to legalize the growing of hemp?! That would mean that there would be many natural products that would compete in the market with synthetics like nylon, rayon, etc. The petroleum companies would not like that, so don't get your hopes up on this.

    And possibly worse still, what would happen to our for profit prison system if they aren't allowed to destroy people's lives for the possession and distribution of the plant? NO, there are way to many business interests that would be threatened by the legalization of the demon weed.
  • kenn123578
    yeah but by putting those other products out of business we save the environment and open newer jobs, think hemp will pretty much replace wood as far as paper goes, you can use it as a biodeisel, i mean is plastic really that important that we cant sacrifice some uses of it to help save our planet and to stop putting inocent people in jail for a gram of kusch, and the fact that weed also has so many possibilities to fighting cancer, yeah some people will suffer but thats what happens with change it effects people but saying products that are bad for the envirnonment will suffer is just something i think we should deal with
  • Thanks for the info. on the bird seed manufacturers, did not know that. You may not be a Christian, I don't know. My point is that even in Genesis chapter 1 it says, that god made all the seed bearing plants, and trees with seed in the fruit, and it was good.
    So even religious protests I do not believe are valid. I am a Christian and I support the complete lift of the prohibition on marijuana. It is a plant that grows wild all over the world, how can that be illegal?
    The government would make a lot of money in taxes and save even more in reducing the war on drugs.
  • marxymcliberalson
    DUh, AMA and you know what else, the world is round, tomatoes aren't poisonous, the sun isnt eaten by a giant turtle every night, illness isn't caused by bad humors, and your soul doesnt get out when you yawn. Welcome to the enlightenment!
  • DownriverDem
    Back in the 1970s I thought it might be legalized. Then we moved into the dark Republican days starting with Reagan and I knew there was no chance.

    Could it be that there is a chance again? It would provide taxes and I'm betting it would be cheaper for customers too.
  • SuperGoof09
    I guess the AMA commitee made that statement right after recieving the bong they ordered from bong-on-line.com...and firing up some "medical jamaican red". Things mellowed out quite a bit soon after. Taco's anyone!
  • pakaal
    Perhaps THE SINGLE most-referenced medical text in the US--the Merck Manual--finds little evidence of any detrimental side effects to smoked cannabis.

    We've suffered from Anschlinger and Heart's bigoted campaign against marijuana long enough, we're losing billions of dollars in the Hemp industry, we push up marijuana prices by keeping it illegal which leads to addicts looking for cheaper highs like meth and crack that actually have a serious detrimental effect on a person's body.... And there is NO comparison between the effects alcohol and tobacco have on a person, and the effects of marijuana on a person. Deaths from marijuana use, ever? Zero.

    Enough is enough!
blog comments powered by Disqus