Visit Citebite Deep link provided by Citebite
Close this shade
Advanced search
Search tips
Back to results  |   < Previous  2 of 10  Next > 
Font Size: Decrease Font Size  Increase Font Size
Related Articles
  View more related articles
Related reference work articles e.g. encyclopedias
  More related reference work articles
Abstract - selected
References - selected
Focus your view on this article
Journal of Transport Geography
Volume 13, Issue 3, September 2005, Pages 207-221

doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.07.003 | How to Cite or Link Using DOI
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier Ltd All rights reserved.
   Cited By in Scopus (9)
  Permissions & Reprints

Sustainable transportation institutions and regional evolution: Global and local perspectivesstar, open
Purchase the full-text article

References and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article.

Kingsley E. HaynesCorresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Jonathan L. Gifford and Danilo Pelletiere

School of Public Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030-4444, USA

Available online 6 October 2004.

Referred to by:Erratum to: Sustainable transportation institutions and regional evolution: Global and local perspectives [Journal of Transport Geography 13 (2005) 207–221]
Journal of Transport Geography, Volume 14, Issue 4, July 2006, Page 326,
Kingsley E. Haynes, Jonathan L. Gifford, Danilo Pelletiere
PDF (47 K)   |      


Sustainable transportation institutions must promote efficient transport utilization and reflect regional demands that often do not align themselves with traditional patterns of political organization. These institutions must confront political legitimacy, economic efficiency and social representation as well as functional effectiveness. Increasing interdependence of mobility demands in terms of safety and efficiency and the embeddedness of transportation in civil society has caused issues of equity, fiscal management and environmental externalities to put new stresses on old slowly evolving transport management institutions.

Key challenges to sustainability relate to effective use of technology in management of international trade and the management of spatial externalities in complex urban infrastructure investments. In both cases significant progress has been made using regional strategies, but tension continues between issues of efficiency and privatization on the one hand and equity and public good responsibilities on the other hand. Institutions evolve and change with these cross pressures and different cultural contexts. Examples of these evolutionary changes are explored in terms of the interaction between technology and governance in international trade and in the frameworks intended to manage metropolitan transportation in the US.

Keywords: Transportation institutions; Sustainability; Spatial spillovers; Cost benefit analysis; Technology; International trade; Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO’s) and Regional Operational Organizations (ROO’s)

Article Outline

The sustainability concept in institutional decisions
Trade, technology, and institutional arrangements in international transportation
4.1. Trade and transport logistics
4.2. Cabotage
4.3. The European regional experience
4.4. Mercosur region experience
4.5. The NAFTA regional experience
Transportation institutional evolution in the United States
5.1. Evolution of regional transportation organizations
5.2. Regional operations
5.3. New regional transportation organizations
5.3.1. Initial impetus
5.3.2. Mission
5.3.3. Structure
5.3.4. Financing
5.3.5. Benefits
5.4. Problems and opportunities

star, openAn early version of this paper was presented as the “Fleming Lecture in Transportation” at the Centennial Meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Philadelphia (March 2004) with Dr. Richard Morrill presiding and Dr. Lay James Gibson as discussant.

Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 703 993 2280; fax: +1 703 993 2284.

Journal of Transport Geography
Volume 13, Issue 3, September 2005, Pages 207-221
Back to results  |   < Previous  2 of 10  Next >