The architect of his own collapse
Paul Wolfowitz's ineptness was on display
long before the World Bank debacle.
By Lawrence Wilkerson
Retired Col. LAWRENCE WILKERSON served 31 years in the Army and was
chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell from 2002 to 2005. He
is now a visiting professor at the College of William & Mary
May 18, 2007
WHEN I WAS ASSIGNED to the U.S. Pacific Command in the mid-1980s, we
military officers would often discuss the ambassadors in our theater of
operations — a huge area embracing more than 30 countries and most of
the Pacific and Indian oceans. One name came up constantly as one of
the best of the best: then-U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia Paul Wolfowitz.
He understood the culture, the people and the special circumstances of
the world's most populous Muslim country, and he did a superb job in
dealing with that country within the context of U.S. national security
interests.
Understand,
then, my wonder over the last few years at Wolfowitz's fall. From my
position, first at the Pentagon, then at the State Department, I
watched the talented Wolfowitz self-destruct. How could such a
successful, intelligent ambassador transmogrify into the petulant old
man I watched fighting unsuccessfully to keep his job as president of
the World Bank?
There were early signs. In 1990, when both of us
were at the Pentagon — I worked for Colin Powell, then the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Wolfowitz for then-Defense Secretary
Dick Cheney — I discovered that Wolfowitz was geared entirely to
conceptual thinking and not to practical action, planning and detail
and the disciplined routine that government requires.
But there
was more. Powell was certain that the Soviet Union was expiring.
Wolfowitz, Robert Gates at the CIA, Cheney and a host of retired
military officers were certain the Soviets would be back. In
Wolfowitz's stand, however, I saw something different from the others:
a stubborn refusal to see beyond the evil of the "evil empire." For
Wolfowitz, it was an ideological blind spot and that made it all the
more obscuring.
I also saw more stark evidence of what a poor
manager Wolfowitz was. He had no idea how to make the trains run on
time — and seemed to have no inclination to do so. Talented people left
his shop saying they could get nothing accomplished. Papers sat in
in-boxes for ages with no action, and the need to deal with daily
mini-crises was supplanted by the desire to turn out hugely complicated
but elegantly expressed "concepts" and "strategies." The rest of the
workaday Pentagon largely ignored Wolfowitz's policy shop as irrelevant.
When
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld picked Wolfowitz in 2000 as his
deputy — to make all the trains in the Pentagon run on time — those of
us who were familiar with Wolfowitz knew a train wreck would occur. It
did, almost immediately, as nothing got through the roadblock of the
deputy's office.
Later, as post-invasion planning for Iraq was
called for, Wolfowitz and the No. 3 man in the department, Douglas
Feith, proved their administrative ineptitude. By that time, I was
working for Secretary of State Powell, and there was increasing
friction between us and the Pentagon. We watched Rumsfeld, in the
arrogance of his power and the hubris of his brilliance, totally ignore
the chaos beneath him, working with now-Vice President Cheney to drive
all trains to Baghdad.
Then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard
Armitage, who had worked at the Pentagon for years before going to the
State Department, once told me that Wolfowitz had to telephone him to
discover what was happening in Wolfowitz's own department. When
Wolfowitz left the Pentagon under somewhat of a cloud because of the
deteriorating situation in Iraq, the bureaucracy breathed a sigh of
relief — not because the architect of the war had departed but because
we longed for a deputy who could get the trains unscrambled (half a
trillion dollars worth of crashing trains at the center of the federal
bureaucracy is a hell of a problem).
But when we heard that
Wolfowitz was going to the World Bank as its president, we knew that it
would be only a matter of time before disaster struck again — that
Wolfowitz's lack of administrative, managerial and leadership skills
would derail him once more. Now it has happened.
Powell used
to say that dreamers rarely succeed unless they build firm foundations
beneath their dreams. But to do that, you need help and a willingness
to get your hands dirty in the real world. That, though, was always
beneath Paul Wolfowitz. And that is what undid him.
Copyright 2007 Los Angeles Times